Alternate Readability Formulas (SMOG / Coleman-Liau / Gunning Fog / ARI)

Four additional reading-grade formulas beyond Flesch-Kincaid.

Run the calculator

Example

You enter

You get

Details, formula, and sources

SMOG (McLaughlin 1969), Coleman-Liau (1975), Gunning Fog (1952), and ARI (Smith + Senter 1967). Same text input as Y.1.

SMOG = 1.043 * sqrt(polysyllables * (30/sentences)) + 3.1291. Coleman-Liau = 0.0588 * L - 0.296 * S - 15.8 (L = letters/100 words; S = sentences/100 words). Gunning Fog = 0.4 * (words/sentences + 100 * complex/words). ARI = 4.71 * (chars/words) + 0.5 * (words/sentences) - 21.43.

SMOG per McLaughlin, 'SMOG Grading: A New Readability Formula,' Journal of Reading 12:8 (1969). Coleman-Liau per Coleman + Liau, 'A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring,' Journal of Applied Psychology 60:2 (1975). Gunning Fog per Gunning, 'The Technique of Clear Writing' (1952). ARI per Smith + Senter, 'Automated Readability Index,' AMRL-TR-66-220 (1967), public-domain federal publication.

AMRL-TR-66-220 free at dtic.mil. The McLaughlin, Coleman-Liau, and Gunning papers are widely summarized in any introductory linguistics or composition reference.

Estimate only. Readability formulas and similar metrics are derived from a representative population and have known edge-case noise. The classroom teacher governs final text selection, grade placement, and assessment decisions.

Field names used by the API: text, sentences

Related tools