Moulding Sand Gas Evolution, Permeability, and Venting

How much gas a mould makes when the metal arrives, and how the sand's permeability trades against the casting's surface.

Run the calculator

Example

You enter

You get

Details, formula, and sources

The two gas terms that can honestly be computed are computed: the water in green sand, flashed to steam at the pouring temperature through the ideal gas law, and the binder, which decomposes at a rate the supplier publishes in cubic centimetres per gram. The third term, air displaced from the cavity, is the smallest of the three and the one people think of first. THE STEAM TERM IS THE ONE THAT SURPRISES. Water expands by roughly seventeen hundred times on flashing at the boil and some seven thousand times at pouring temperature, so a sand a percent or two over its target moisture generates gas faster than any permeability can pass it. That is a gas problem no venting fixes and no sand change fixes: the control is at the muller, which is why green sand moisture is held tightly and why a rain-affected or over-tempered sand blows. CORES ARE THE WORST CASE AND ARE NOT IN THIS ARITHMETIC. A core is surrounded by metal on nearly every side, its binder decomposes as soon as the metal arrives, and its only escape is through its own body to its prints and out of the mould. A core that is unvented, or whose prints seal against the mould, has nowhere to send that gas except into the casting, and the blowholes appear on the cored surface where the casting is hardest to inspect. Core venting is therefore a design decision made before the pattern exists, and it is the single highest-yield thing to check when a cored casting gasses. The permeability trade is the foundry's constant tension and it does not resolve in general. Fine sand packs tightly, gives a smooth surface and passes gas poorly; coarse sand vents well and leaves a rough casting. Permeability goes roughly with the square of grain size, so a modest fineness change moves it substantially -- and a casting that blows on a fine sand may run sound on a coarser one, at a cost in finish that the customer's requirement either permits or does not. That is why a foundry runs more than one sand system. This estimates gas VOLUMES from entered weights and rates. It does not predict whether a casting will gas, which depends on the RATE gas is generated against the rate the mould passes it and on the path the gas must take, neither of which is computed here. It does not size vents or supply a required vent area, model flow through the sand, measure or predict the AFS permeability number, evaluate core print fit, address mould hardness, compaction, or ramming, or distinguish the many binder systems and their very different gas volumes and decomposition behaviours. The gas-per-vent-area figure is a comparative number for ranking a mould against one that ran sound, not an acceptance criterion. AFS test procedures, the binder supplier's gas evolution data, and the foundry's own methods engineer govern.

green sand steam volume from the ideal gas law PV = nRT (R = 10.7316 ft^3 psi per lbmol degR, water 18.0153 lb per lbmol) at the entered pouring temperature and one atmosphere, plus binder gas = binder mass x an entered evolution rate in cm3 per gram; permeability is scaled with the SQUARE of grain size.

Foundry mould gas estimation. spec-v1715 supplied no arithmetic of its own, so only relations that can be defended from first principles are computed and everything else is stated as guidance. The binder gas evolution rate is ENTERED because binder suppliers publish it in cm3/g and it differs by binder system and by the metal poured against it.

The ideal gas law and one published binder rate.

Estimate. AHJ and licensed professional govern.

Field names used by the API: mould_sand_lb, moisture_pct, binder_lb, binder_gas_cm3_g, pour_temp_f, vent_area_in2, permeability_number, fineness_change_pct, water_lb, steam_volume_in3, binder_gas_in3, total_gas_in3, expansion_ratio, new_permeability_number

Related tools