Overcurrent Selective Coordination Screen
Whether two overcurrent devices in series will let the downstream one clear a fault alone.
Example
You enter
- Device type breaker
- Upstream device rating (A) 400
- Downstream device rating (A) 100
- Published fuse ratio for the family (fuses only) 2
- Upstream instantaneous pickup, x rating (breakers only) 10
- Available fault current at the downstream device (A) 12000
You get
- Rating ratio 4.00 : 1
- Instantaneous pickup 4000 A
- Coordination holds to 4000 A
Details, formula, and sources
Screened the way each device type actually behaves. Fuses coordinate on a RATIO, and the ratio is a published test result for a specific fuse family rather than a general rule. Within a family, an upstream fuse at or above the published ratio will not open before a downstream one clears, at any fault current up to the interrupting rating -- which is why fuses coordinate all the way down and why the ratio table is the whole answer. Circuit breakers fail differently and that is the part worth understanding. A thermal-magnetic breaker's instantaneous element trips essentially without delay, so once the fault current exceeds the upstream breaker's instantaneous pickup, BOTH devices open and selectivity is lost no matter how far apart the ratings are: a 400 A upstream against a 100 A downstream looks like a comfortable four-to-one and coordinates not at all above the pickup. Coordination therefore holds only up to that pickup current, and whether that is acceptable depends entirely on the available fault current at the downstream device. The breaker case has three fixes and they are all real work: raise the instantaneous setting if the breaker allows it and the downstream equipment survives the longer clearing time, move to a breaker with a short-time delay and no instantaneous -- which raises incident energy, so the arc-flash and coordination requirements genuinely conflict -- or use fuses. A screen, never a study: the manufacturer's published ratio tables and time-current curves, a full coordination study, and the engineer of record govern.
fuses: ratio = upstream_rating / downstream_rating, coordinated when ratio >= the family's published minimum, and then to the interrupting rating. breakers: pickup = upstream_rating x instantaneous_multiplier, and coordination holds only up to that current.
Selective coordination screened by device type -- fuses against the manufacturer's published minimum ratio for the family (commonly 2:1), which holds to the interrupting rating, and breakers only up to the upstream instantaneous pickup, above which both devices open. Cited by name; the ratio and the instantaneous setting are the manufacturer's published values and are entered rather than bundled. A screen, never a study: the published time-current curves, a full coordination study, and the engineer of record govern.
Both screens are comparisons on values the user reads off the manufacturer's published data; no ratio table or time-current curve is reproduced.
Estimate. AHJ and licensed professional govern.
Field names used by the API: device_type, upstream_rating_a, downstream_rating_a, published_ratio, instantaneous_multiplier, available_fault_a, ratio, pickup_a, coordinated_to_a
- Fuse ratios are tested a published ratio for a specific family, not a general rule; met, it holds to the interrupting ratingfuse manufacturer coordination tables
- Breakers lose selectivity above pickup above the upstream instantaneous pickup BOTH open, whatever the ratioovercurrent protection practice
- The conflict is real removing the instantaneous to coordinate raises arc-flash incident energyovercurrent protection practice